Apple and Steve Jobs’ Biggest Mistakes Ep 1 – The Macintosh

Hello, and therefore welcomed another escapade of The iBook Guy. Now, because I range a canal which is primarily focused on Apple commodities, I’m often blamed and called an Apple fanboy, told that I’m biased or not objective in regarding Apple products, and that’s just absolutely no truth to the rumors. In fact, I’m often critical of Apple makes, and including Steve Jobs as well, who I do respect but, he most certainly didn’t do everything privilege. So, I fantasized I would create a little miniseries showing some of any issues that I recollect Apple has done that are mistakes, and I’m going to start with a big one, all the way back in 1986, which is the Macintosh. Okay, so this is the Macintosh Plus. Now, this is almost exactly like the original 1984 Macintosh, the only difference is just a modest cache ameliorate. Now, this was Apple’s flagship product. This was the scaffold that was supposed to take their company into the future. Okay , now this is the Apple IIGS. This is essentially the upgrade from Apple’s aging Apple II line of products, which had been around since 1977. Alright , now get ready for me to blow your spirit with a fascinating conspiracy ideology. Both of these machines are on the market at the same time, in 1986. Let’s do a little comparison. First, let’s take a look at the raw hardware specifications. Okay, so both machines had a 16 -bit CPU. Now, the Mac’s CPU had almost three times the clock acceleration, though. Alright , now what might surprise you is that the Motorola chip used in the Mac was not as efficient per cycle as the WDC chip used in the Apple IIGS. But is not simply that, the Apple IIGS are able to race a lot faster, but Apple solely limited in order to make sure it didn’t compete with the Macintosh. How crazy is that? As for RAM, the Macintosh could substantiate up to 4MB, whereas the IIGS could subsidize up to 8MB, determining the Apple IIGS the clear winner now. Let’s look at the graphics. the Mac had a monochrome screen and let me be clear, it literally had only two colorings; black or white-hot. There “werent any” colors of gray at all.Fine for verse, I suppose, but this was what some common games was like on the Mac. They weren’t very pretty. On the other hand, the IIGS had full-color graphics with 4096 hues, same to other 16 -bit machines of the epoch. You can clearly see a huge difference here; the IIGS is also the clear win in this category. What about racket? The Mac has a single 8-bit DAC for playing tests. Now, this was okay for putting little hubbubs into your programs. But synthesizing any sort of music compelled the CPU to do a lot of work.The IIGS on the other hand has a very advanced synthesizer chip, which can offload most of the project, so the CPU doesn’t have to do it; again, enhancing the overall accelerate of the system, despite the slower clock acceleration. Again, the IIGS is clearly the win. Okay, so what about expandability? Well, the Macintosh had basically no internal expansion slots. It had the basic ports like serial, external drives, etc. But that was about it. The IIGS on the other hand had those same external ports, but likewise had eight internal placard sockets that can be used for all sorts of things. Once again, the IIGS is the clear winner in this category. Ok, so if the IIGS can do all of these things, surely it must be the most expensive product, right? Well, you’d be wrong; the Mac sold for $ 2,599, whereas the IIGS sold for $ 999. Now you might say that comparison isn’t fair, because the Mac had a built-in monitor, whereas the IIGS customer would need to purchase that separately. Okay , no problem.The observer overheads $499. So that’s more than a thousand dollars less costly than the Mac. I’ll likewise be underlined that the IIGS was the first to introduce the ADB keyboard and mouse bus, where the Macintosh was still utilizing a proprietary keyboard and mouse at this spot in time. Alright, so let’s bust two more fallacies. Now, one thing one person might say is: well, what you were paying for with the Macintosh is the extravagant graphical operating system that was revolutionary and that the hardware in the Mac was specifically designed around this software, and what you’re going to see is that’s not entirely true.And yes, that was certainly the Mac’s defining quality in the marketplace, but let me show you the IIGS running its own graphical operating system, known as GS OS. Not only does it gaze precisely like the Mac’s operating system, but it was also in full color, so I dare say it seemed better, and equipped a better overall suffer to the user. It are also welcome to organize system shares from a Macintosh server, as well as read and write to Macintosh formatted floppy disk. So soul might say: well, the Apple IIGS is just a continuing of the Apple II line, and Apple certainly needed a fresh start with a brand-new programme, in order to be allowed to to put all of the, you know, the gift nonsense containing them back from boosting the stage a little more.Well, let me introduce you to this thing called the Mega-II chip. This chipping is a complete Apple IIe system integrated into a single microchip. This is the same chip that was used in the Apple IIe card, that was later used to give the Macintosh LC backwards-compatibility with Apple II software. So, this same chip is essentially what grants the Apple IIGS backwards-compatibility with the Apple II, because otherwise, it is a completely new platform. Okay, so here’s what I’ve been building up to in this whole video. Why did Apple go ahead and drop and forget such systems, and finish it a few years later, and instead concentrate the entire corporation on advancing this make, when clearly, this produce was overpriced and underpowered, compared to this one.Now, the only conclusion I can come up with is Steve Jobs. Now, if you know the history of Apple, you know that he was essentially shot from the company, or at least knocked out of his enterprise, and eventually they made him back in and make him take over the Macintosh project. Now, the Macintosh was supposed to be a low-end consumer device. It was actually kind of supposed to be a side project But he various kinds of made it over, beefed it up and essentially established it into Apple’s flagship make, probably in order to gain more sovereignty back in the company again.Now, by the time that the Mac Plus and the Apple IIGS were on the market, Steve Jobs have now been become again. Nonetheless, I think what we’re discovering is, we’re still seeing the force from when he was at the company. So, I guess what I’m trying to say is I conclude the entire Macintosh line was a mistake from the very beginning. Apple should have been working on this make and boosting it. I think that during the 1990 s, they would have been far[ more] competitive than they were because they kinda came hurled back, lost a lot of their patron locate, because of this product. Now, I think today, if they were still in business, the products they would might be representing today is very likely be very similar to what they’re making now, and they would probably still be using Intel processors, and so on.They would have basically came back to where they are now, but I belief the company would have done better during the time that Apple approximately went bankrupt, if the government has followed the road of this machine instead of this one. So that about wraps this up, so yeah. The first mistake I wanted to point out that Apple obliged was of course, structure the Mac line. Now, I’ve got some other mistakes that I think they’ve met over the years and I’ll extent those out in an upcoming video. Until then, I’ll pleased to meet you.[ outro] Subtitles by: NovaCubes_[ Edited/ fixed by TVtremor]

Leave a Reply